Sunday, August 25, 2019

The Massacre at Sand Creek

Colonel Chivington led a force of approximately 700 men overnight to the Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho camp at Sand Creek, arriving on the morning of November 29 1864. Major Anthony, now with a sufficient force to attack, commanded 125 troops of the Colorado First from Fort Lyon. Lieutenant Wilson led a further 125 men of the Colorado First, and Colonel Shoup led 450 men of the Colorado Third.

The camp at Sand Creek contained approximately 100 lodges and an estimated 500 Indians were residing there under the assumed protection of the U.S. Army. At the time of the attack, the vast majority of the warriors were out hunting. The males who stayed at the camp were either too young or too old to hunt. The remainder were women and children.

On seeing hundreds of soldiers on horseback riding towards the camp, Black Kettle hoisted a large American flag, with a smaller white flag tied to it, over his lodge, which had been given to him by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, A. B. Greenwood four years earlier. Greenwood had told Black Kettle to raise this flag when approached by soldiers to indicate that they were peaceful. Special Indian agent and interpreter, John Smith, who was camped with the Indians at Sand Creek at the time of the attack, ran out to the oncoming soldiers, but instead of stopping, they opened fire.

Cheyenne chief White Antelope, also ran out, waving his hands frantically, shouting for the soldiers to stop, before realising the futility of his efforts, stood, arms folded, chanting his death song before being shot and killed. The troops scalped his head and cut off his ears and nose. The small number of warriors fought as best they could to hold off the attack, so that others, including Black Kettle, could escape.

Andrew J. Gill, a volunteer aid to Chivington later testified in a military investigation into the massacre at Sand Creek that Chivington gave a speech just prior to the attack where he said, “Now boys, I sha’nt say who you shall kill, but remember our murdered women and children.” Captain Silas Soule, who opposed Chivington’s attack against peaceful Indians, refused to take part in the fighting and ordered his men not to fire.

Soule recounted in a letter written to Major Wynkoop a couple of weeks after the massacre, that he had witnessed little children, who were on their knees surrendering, having their “brains beaten out” by soldiers, and a wounded squaw having her arm cut off with a hatchet while trying to defend herself, before the soldier “dashed the hatchet through her brain.”

The subsequent investigations into the massacre revealed other atrocities carried out on the day. One eye witness reported seeing an Indian child of about three years old, “perfectly naked,” who was walking behind the Indians who were fleeing the attack, being shot at by three different soldiers in turn before the “little fellow dropped.”

By the end of the fighting over one hundred Indians had been killed. Two-thirds of them were women and children. All of the dead were scalped, some had up to half a dozen scalps taken from their heads. Most were mutilated, some had their fingers cut off to steal their rings, while the chiefs as well as others had their genitalia cut off and taken as trophies.

The mutilations were:

1. Cutting off of women's breasts for use as hats and as tobacco pouches.

2. Cutting out of women's and girls vaginas which were worn again, as hats and used as saddle decorations.

3. Cutting off of men's and boys ball sacs and used for trophies to wear around their necks and to use as again, tobacco pouches.

Over the following weeks, Chivington and his men were lauded in the Denver press by the editor of the Rocky Mountain News, William Byers, who wrote in December, “Among the brilliant feats of arms in Indian warfare, the recent campaign of our Colorado volunteers will stand in history with few rivals,” and that they had carried out a “thousand incidents of individual daring” and “once again covered themselves with glory.” Chivington led the victory parade of the now named Bloody Third Regiment into Denver to a hero’s welcome.
Indian agent Sam Colley, outraged by the massacre at Sand Creek, wrote to U.S. Senator James R. Doolittle of Wisconsin, who was a member of the Joint Congressional Committee on the Conduct of the (Civil) War. Colley informed Doolittle that the Indians who had been attacked were peaceful and under the protection of his Indian agency and Fort Lyon. News of the massacre continued to spread and on January 10, 1865, the U.S. House of Representatives directed the Committee on the Conduct of the War to hold hearings to try to establish what took place at Sand Creek.

General Curtis immediately requested the resignation of Chivington in the hope that it would prevent an army inquiry into the matter. Chivington resigned, but it was futile. On January 11, the army chief of Staff, General Halleck ordered Curtis to open an investigation. Curtis reinstated Major Wynkoop as commander of Fort Lyon and asked him to conduct an investigation into the attack at Sand Creek. Wynkoop’s sent a report to Curtis containing testimonies received from John Smith, his teamster Watson Clark, Private David Lauderback, and Indian agent Sam Colley. All were scathing in their denunciations of Chivington’s attack.

On March 13 1865, the Committee on the Conduct of the War began congressional hearings in Washington D.C. regarding the events which had occurred at Sand Creek. Indian agent John Smith gave his eye witness testimony as to the atrocities he had witnessed carried out by Chivington’s men. Smith told how he had witnessed around 100 Indians, men, women and children, surrounded by soldiers who fired on them indiscriminately. Smith testified that he witnessed Indians killed from “sucking infants up to warriors…women cut all to pieces, worse mutilated” than he had ever seen before, with “their brains knocked out.”

Smith felt that Chivington’s reason for the attack at Sand Creek was that he had intended to rerun for Congress and that an Indian war would result in him remaining in Colorado where he could continue “electioneering.” Smith also stated that Major Anthony had promised the Indians camped at Sand Creek protection.

Further investigations into the massacre

Anthony testified on the second the day of the hearing that he had told the Indians that he would inform them if he received instructions from Curtis if there was to be any change in policy towards them. He added that Chivington’s arrival and subsequent attack, of which he was a part, occurred before that happened. Anthony also stated that he was opposed to attacking Sand Creek as a matter of policy rather than morality. He felt that by attacking Sand Creek it would inevitably lead to a larger war with the Indians camped at Smoky Hill.

He stated that he had told Chivington that once they had a force strong enough that he would be in favour of a more general war against all the Indians. Anthony also admitted witnessing soldiers committing many acts of mutilation, and that the only way to fight Indians, was to “fight them as they fight us.” “If they scalp and mutilate the bodies, then we must do the same,” as well as “killing women and children”.

Governor Evans testified before the committee on the third day and pleaded ignorance regarding Chivington’s intentions to attack, and also that the Indians camped there were known to be peaceful. Evans suggested that a “great many” of the reports had come from people he knew were enemies of Chivington. His evasiveness before the committee did not save his political career, as his resignation was requested by Secretary of State, William H. Seward a few weeks later.

The committee reprimanded Chivington in the most withering terms. It stated that Chivington had “planned and executed a foul and dastardly massacre” against the Indians at Sand Creek, “having full knowledge of their friendly character, having himself been instrumental to some extent in placing them in their position of fancied security, took advantage of their inapprehension and defenceless condition to gratify the worst passions that ever cursed the heart of man.”

A second investigation conducted by a joint special committee of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives also concluded that Chivington had perpetrated a massacre at Sand Creek of Indians who believed they were under the protection of the U.S. Army. Chivington provided the joint committee with a written deposition outlining his version of events at Sand Creek.

In it, Chivington stated that he believed the Indians camped at Sand Creek were of the same tribes who were known to be hostile towards whites and that he “had every reason to believe” that they were either “directly or indirectly involved.” He also said that the officers he sent out after the attack to ascertain the numbers of dead, reported seeing “but few women and children dead” and that he personally had only seen one dead woman and no dead children.

Chivington did acknowledge that Major Wynkoop had allowed the Indians to camp at Fort Lyon under the protection of the American flag before his replacement Major Anthony drove them out after they failed to comply with General Curtis’s terms. Chivington went on to point the finger of blame at Anthony and Major Colley who had told him that the Indians encamped at Sand Creek were hostile, but never mentioned to him that they were under the protection of the government.

A third hearing, this one presided over by a three-man military commission ran for seventy-six days. It was solely a fact-finding mission to determine whether Chivington had acted in accordance with the rule of civilised warfare, that the Indians at Sand Creek were under the protection of the United State Army, and that Chivington had taken the necessary measures to prevent “unnatural outrages” by the soldiers during after the attack.

Chivington was allowed to cross examine the witnesses who testified against him, such as Major Wynkoop, Captain Silas Soule, Lieutenants Cannon, Minton and Cossitt among others. When the committee adjourned in May 1865, it issued no conclusions. The 228 pages of written testimony were printed two years later and subsequently filed in government archives.

Chivington’s attack at Sand Creek failed to bring him the glory and political power he so desperately wished for. It brought him infamy, disgrace, and dishonour. He, along with the men responsible for the massacre have gone down in history as having taken part in one of the darkest episodes of the decades long conflict between the United States and the Native Americans.
It’s dawn, November 29, 1864.

The sun is barely peekabooing over the mountainous horizon in southern Colorado Territory, sparkling across the chilly waters of Big Sandy Creek.

In a tiny, tucked-away pocket of riverbed flatland, bands of Arapaho and Southern Cheyenne are camped. In total, more than 400 American Indians are quietly preparing for the day.

Around the river bend, Col. John Milton Chivington, of the U.S. Volunteers, is briefing nearly 1,000 heavily armed men for battle. (Most are still drunk from anticipatory revelry the night before.) They’ve marched nearly 50 midnight miles, and they’re ready to fight.

What comes next will forever be remembered as one of the most infamous and deadly incidents in all of the American Indian Wars.

Time of War

The American Indian Wars bridge more than 200 years of conflicts between Native Americans and New World settlers, spanning across the entirety of the United States, from the Powhatan Indian Attack in 1622, when Powhatan Indians retaliate against the encroaching Virginia colonists, to the end of the Apache Wars in 1886, after Geronimo surrenders in Arizona’s Skeleton Canyon.
But until the mid-1800s, most of these conflicts occur in the East and South. The West is a no man’s land, filled with harsh mountainous landscapes and cold nights. There is little need for white settlers to venture westward, leaving the vast plains to the American Indians who have called them home for centuries.

Then comes the California gold rush in 1849.

It is a time of rapid growth and expansion. Hundreds of thousands of white settlers trek westward, dreaming of land, gold, and prosperity. Mining and farming communities spring up.
And the effects on American Indians are considerable.

Pristine hunting grounds are destroyed. Game becomes scarce. Waters are polluted. Smallpox, influenza, and measles spread in large numbers. Fatality rates skyrocket to more than 75 percent.
In the years following the gold rush, tensions between Native Americans and white settlers in the West escalate. Deadly skirmishes become increasingly commonplace.

As the bloody Civil War begins in the East and South, the West becomes filled with its own unique brand of war. The vacuum left by departing U.S. Army troops, who are dispatched to fight the Confederacy, is filled by U.S. Volunteers, state militias, and renegade roughnecks. This proxy army takes its charge to protect the remaining settlers to heart, ultimately exacting its own brand of vengeance on the American Indians who dare to stand their ground, believing even at the end that they have a chance at peace.

Place of Peace

Violent battles ensue for months. But bloodshed can only last so long. After years of being out-manned, Arapaho and Southern Cheyenne tribes are resigned to negotiate peace with federal authorities.

The Treaty of Fort Laramie in 1851 first defines Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho territory as the lands between the Rocky Mountains and western Kansas, including present-day Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado.

Conflicts still arise, but the treaty stands for nearly a decade. Still, by 1861 the westward expansion is marching on. America’s rapid population growth in the West has federal authorities keen to redefine Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho territories once again.

And with few options, the chiefs of both tribes agree to sign the Treaty of Fort Wise, ceding most of the lands designated to them in the Fort Laramie treaty. Their new territory is less than a tenth of the size of their previous reserves.

In exchange for giving up the bulk of their native land, the Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho are promised peaceful asylum in a designated safe zone — near a tributary of the Arkansas River called Big Sandy Creek.

But Col. John Milton Chivington doesn’t believe in peace treaties.

Chivington’s Attack

The Methodist preacher turned Civil War hero is still raw after spending years fighting Confederate flag-waving soldiers and treaty-waving Indians. He’s tasted blood, and now he’s on the warpath. With hundreds of unsuspecting American Indians just around the corner, he’s found his perfect opportunity.
He stands to address his men, knowing full well that the Arapaho and Southern Cheyenne pose no threat.

“Damn any man who sympathizes with Indians!” he says. “I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God’s heaven to kill Indians.
”
And then, for emphasis: “Kill and scalp all, big and little.”

He does just that. It’s a violent affair from the start.

As the chaos begins, the American Indians raise American and white flags — symbols of peace. But Chivington ignores the plea, instead raising his arm for attack.

Cannon and rifle fire rain down upon the village. Indians scatter. The hysterical militiamen charge, chasing down men, women, and children, killing them cruelly and without mercy.

The unrelenting attack lasts most of the day. The militia uses more than 1 ton of ammunition.

But once the shooting ends, the bloodshed doesn’t cease. Chivington wants victory, not prisoners. So, as the smoke clears, his militia slaughters the wounded. They scalp the dead, mutilating women, children, and infants. They cut off the women's breasts and cut out their vaginas. They stripped the skin off the children's backs to cure as leather. They cut off the men's and boy's scrotum's to use as tobacco pouches and to wear as trophies around their necks. They ransack the village, taking supplies and livestock. Whatever is left, they destroy and burn.

In all, Chivington’s men scalp, rape, and murder hundreds of Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho people. Meanwhile, the militia loses fewer than 10 men, mostly due to friendly fire and sloppiness.
According to Congressional testimony in 1865 by John S. Smith, an American interpreter present at the time of the attack, the carnage was ghastly.

“I saw the bodies of those lying there cut all to pieces, worse mutilated than any I ever saw before; the women cut all to pieces ... . With knives; scalped; their brains knocked out; children two or three months old; all ages lying there, from sucking infants up to warriors ... .

The Aftermath

Just weeks later, an editorial in the Rocky Mountain News notes, “In no single battle in North America, we believe, have so many Indians been slain.” But to this day, the exact number of slain Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho is still unknown. At the time, Chivington claims as many as 600 were killed. Historians will say the number is likely closer to 160, mostly women and children.
In the weeks immediately following the massacre, Chivington is praised for his “heroic victory” at Sand Creek. He’s even honored with a parade throughout the streets of Denver. The colonel publicly displays his battle trophies in theaters and saloons.

But the merriment doesn’t last long. Soon, rumors of what really happened begin to circulate. Several investigations are conducted, including two by the military and one by the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War.

The latter panel concludes, “the truth is that [Chivington] surprised and murdered, in cold blood, the unsuspecting men, women, and children on Sand creek, who had every reason to believe they were under the protection of the United States authorities, and then returned to Denver and boasted of the brave deeds he and the men under his command had performed.”

Despite the decision, no charges are brought against Chivington and his men. Chivington resigns from the service in 1865, and public humiliation ends his dreams of becoming a politician. Instead, he lives out his life working as a freight hauler, editor, and deputy sheriff until his death in 1894.


#NativeAmericans #SandCreekMassacre #ColJohnChivington #Arapaho #SouthernCheyenne

No comments:

Post a Comment

Family Stories from the Trail of Tears

Family Stories from the Trail of Tears Family Stories from the Trail of Tears (taken from the Indian-Pioneer History Collection, Grant Fo...